Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Shirking responsibility?

Letters

Reading Robert Benaim's letter (NCE last week) left me feeling depressed.

Of course designers have a responsibility to ensure that what they do can be built. For too long contractors have been left to construct impossible designs.

For Mr Benaim to say that designers should not be burdened with the safety of the construction process, that it is unfair and will not improve safety, demonstrates a frightening lack of understanding of what the current law and common sense demand.

If Mr Benaim thinks it is a heavy burden for designers perhaps he should reflect on the burden of those on site when presented with something that is impossible to build.

Designers can do more.

Devoting money and resources to more inspectors is not the only answer. Educating our engineers has to be the way forward.

So what about a compulsory health and safety module in degree courses - 40 hours in a four year course is surely not out of the question. There is a school of thought that safety can be just 'picked up' on site but would we consider the same approach to using a level or calculating soil slip circles?

Charlie Hutchison (M), 110 Movilla Road, Newtownards, N Ireland, BR23 8RQ

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.