Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sewer talk


The article on sewage reuse (NCE last week) reminded me of a proposal I put to Thames Water's management, when, as principal design engineer, water supply, I was involved in design of the Thames Water Ring Main.

My proposal was to divert a proportion of Beckton sewage works discharge and to transfer this in a tunnel back to the Thames Valley storage reservoir complex to the west of London.

The Beckton water would be diluted and undergo additional treatment due to its storage time in the reservoirs.

Running costs would primarily be focused on pumping, but only the head difference between Beckton and the Thames Valley reservoirs. The flow through the tunnel would be driven by gravity, the same as in the Ring Main.

Capital cost would be high, but in the light of proposals to install desalination plants it would be worthwhile undertaking a cost comparison No doubt my submission is somewhere in Thames Water's records and could be worth investigating as it was well developed and costed.

John Kerslake (M ret), Abingdon, maggie.kerslake@btinternet. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.