Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Selection criteria


Roads consultants and contractors scoring highest under the Highways Agency's new supplier rating system do not necessarily stand the best chance of winning work, the Agency warned this week.

Lower ranked firms with strong track records and could overtake them in the final assessments of bids, said supply chain manager Gary Wright.

'One of the things that is concerning me a little is the absolute fixation on CAT scores, ' said Wright.

He said that CAT scores would form part of the process for short listing firms for highways work over £5M. Track record on similar projects would also count for 20% of the overall rating during short listing.

And an 'overview' assessment factor will also be used before final vendor ratings are calculated. This will take into account how much work a firm already has with the Agency to ensure that no one dominates the market.

It would also account for 'exceptional events' like accidents, which could count against firms implicated in them.

Once shortlisted, contractors and consultants would be questioned on their ability to control costs, deliver on time and minimise defects.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.