Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Scarborough and Nuttall still in dispute over sea defence

News

SCARBOROUGH BOROUGH Council has admitted that it remains locked in dispute with contractor Nuttall over the fi nal cost of its coastal defence project, almost a year after a row erupted over cracks in the defence structures.

Work on the scheme to protect the Scarborough headland fi ished in summer 2004, but the contractor is yet to reach agreement with the council over a £27M cost overrun.

The fi al scheme price has doubled to an estimated £54M, owing to delays caused by unexpected ground conditions, limits imposed on working hours and cracks found in the mass concrete Accropodes used to defend the coastline.

Danish consultant Cowi was hired at a cost of £140,000 to investigate the cause of the cracking, and it was expected to report back to the council in January (NCE 2 December 2004). The investigation has still not been concluded.

Consultant HighPoint Rendel is advising the council on how much Nuttall should be paid, and earlier this year said it should be paid only £34M of the £54M costs (NCE 17 March).

HighPoint Rendel is still acting as consultant for the council on the project, despite revelations from the Audit Commission last year that its contract had been awarded to HPR unlawfully (NCE 16/30 December 2004).

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.