Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sartor review blocks new path to chartership

ICE news

HUNDREDS OF engineers are finding a new path to chartered status blocked because the Engineering Council (UK) is refusing to approve it, the ICE has said.

EC (UK) has told the ICE that it will not accredit any new routes to membership during its current review of Sartor (Standards & Routes to Registration).

The decision comes in spite of a successful pilot of a new ICE devised route earlier in the year.

The ICE estimates that up to 300 civil engineers are now ready to sit its new Career Appraisal (Academic) Review (CA) route.

The CA route will allow engineers to become chartered even if they have not followed a formal period of structured professional development on an approved training scheme.

'On 17 October we went to EC(UK) for approval. But EC(UK) has put this temporarily on hold while it considers the effect on any planned change to Sartor, ' said ICE professional development director Jon Prichard.

The CA route is one of two new routes to membership developed by the ICE in 2002 so candidates can use their experience to compensate for shortfalls in academic qualifications.

The other one - direct entry to Fellowship - is for senior engineers. It replaces the existing senior route to membership and has been cleared by EC(UK).

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.