Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rules of engagement

Letters

I find one aspect of Mark Hansford's report (ICE News last week) of Bernard Gambrill's advice to the ALGS disturbing. Gambrill was surely not wrong to engage public participation early in the options for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link.

Delaying consultation until your mind is made up risks the justifiable accusation from the public of meaningless involvement in what appears to them to be a fait accompli.

Many years of experience with the early stages of major road schemes on behalf of a county council taught me that inadequate consideration of alternative alignments leads to extensive delays. Engineers frequently have to go back to the drawing board and repeat public consultations when questions are raised which cannot be answered at the initial public exhibition or meeting.

People need to be convinced, as far as possible, that you have done your homework by thoroughly investigating and evaluating all feasible options and are presenting them with all the relevant data so they can give you an informed response.

Response, of course, is not always totally based on a logical assessment of information, but it is something that has to be accepted as unavoidable.

Property blight can be limited by planning your selection process to minimise the period between publication of options and making the decision. It may be that the lack of detail in the preparation of the options caused the problem with CTRL consultations.

JA James (Ret M), 64 Chapel Street, Billericay, Essex CM12 9LS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.