Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rope trick


I refer to the cover story 'Maths problem' (NCE 16 January). I would humbly suggest that the answer given to Question 2 is incorrect. The tension in rope at X is 42N; tension in rope at Y = 56N, the opposite way round from the published answer.

I confirmed this not by checking my mathematics, but by applying basic engineering principles and taking moments about the centroid.

Engineering is not simply about getting the right numbers, but understanding the basic principles.

Like Antony Oliver, I have struggled with maths, but only when taught as an academic subject. I have successfully designed structures using maths as well as computer models. Even though I am unable to answer questions 1 or 3, I was able to derive the correct answer to Question 2.

Perhaps we should worry less about mathematical theory and concentrate more on its practice?

Saul Huck (G), Conwy, North Wales saul. huck@conwy. gov. uk

Editor's note: Apologies. In the answer to Question 2 last week the forces at X and Y were indeed transposed.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.