Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Risky Business

It is fascinating to see how traditional contracts seem to be finding favour again (Leader last week).
The undeniable truths are that contractors will always seek a competitive advantage and, as long as the risks are reasonably apportioned, that this process will also generate best value for a client.

Design and build, or early contractor involvement, fail where the risks are transferred too extensively and/or where the contractor is given limited opportunity, or reward, to really innovate, and thus create best value.

If traditional contracts re-appear, then I can see the scope for alternative designs, of which we have done hundreds, simply re-appearing also – each contractor will want his competitive edge. All that happens is that the original design effort is partly wasted – not an efficient use of our industry's precious resources.

Design and build, with consultants really working closely with contractors, in a truly non-confrontational environment, will always generate best value, as long as the risk profiles are sensible and the rewards for all are achievable.

SIMON BOURNE (F), managing director, Benaim,

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.