Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rights of passage

Letters

I am disgusted by the attitude of Westminster Council with regard to its views on providing new wheelchair access to One Great George Street (NCE 13/20 April).

If wheelchair users are expected to use an alternative entrance, why spend £200,000 creating another segregated route? If the basement route forms a suitable access perhaps this could become the main entrance for everyone, unless, with suitable work, universal access can be made through the existing entrance.

I recognise Westminster Council's wish to retain the appearance of One Great George Street, but the building is not just a monument, and the needs of today's citizens should be recognised. Isn't history about learning from mistakes, including lack of accessibility?

The best designs are about simplicity and ease of use. Any option must offer this, and not be disguised or made overly complicated, so those with disabilities - whether physical, sensory or cognitive - can easily see how they can independently enter the building.

If you can manage this, we will have something we can be truly proud of as engineers.

S Walmsley (G) 28 Elm Drive, Stretford, Manchester, M32 9AW

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.