Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Review of UK airport policy called for

An independent review to establish true benefits and impacts of aviation was called for today by the Sustainable Development Commission and the Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr). They claim that UK Air Transport Policy is based on disputed evidence and could undermine climate policy decisions.

A report published today, " Breaking the holding pattern - A new approach to aviation policy making in the UK" published by the SDC and ippr finds that available data on the benefits and impacts of aviation is widely disputed and inadequate for reliable decision making on the future of UK air travel.

The report highlights the controversy over quoted figures used in policy making including the benefits to the economy and the industry's contribution to climate change and concludes that the high levels of conflict around the effects of aviation are bad for government, the industry, and citizens, creating rising distrust and undermining policy decisions.

The SDC and ippr recommend that the government should convene a special commission to compile an updated evidence base on the economic, social and environmental benefits and costs of UK aviation and the findings should be incorporated into the Air Transport White Paper

They also advise that proposed expansion at Heathrow should be put on hold until the Air Transport White Paper has been reviewed. The review would also have implications for decisions on expansion at other UK airports, including Stansted.

"The SDC and ippr held meetings with the Government, the aviation industry, academics, NGOs and citizens' groups over a period of a year," said Commissioner at the Sustainable Development Commission Hugh Raven.

"While we expected to find areas of conflict, we were unprepared for the level of fundamental disagreement over the data underpinning the Government's whole aviation strategy. Until some basic questions are answered, the UK cannot be in a position to make major decisions about the future of air travel. The Government must live up to its commitment to listening to voters' concerns, and ensure we make the best possible decisions for everyone involved."

Associate Director of ippr Simon Retallack said
"Good policy-making needs to be based on evidence that is widely agreed to be sound, which is not the case when it comes to aviation policy. Before any major new decisions are taken on airports, it is vital that the evidence is looked at again through an independent and widely supported process. Establishing a special commission to do that provides the Government with the best way forward."

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs