Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookies Policy

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


Broader and deeper


You are right, Adrian, on the need to widen our members' "knowledge base" but hard to see how this is to be done. 200 years ago an engineer was either 'military' or 'civil' - Brunel demonstrating the very wide range of skills of the latter. Today it's much harder. In the 1950s I was involved in two long-term contracts, one in Northumberland and one in Nigeria. In the former it was decided to engage management consultants - rare in those days - and I was sent on a six week induction course with them before joining their man on the contract. A serious potential loss was reversed within 18 months. Five years later the same approach was taken on the already profitable Nigerian contract. In long contracts I saw two phases. First, civil engineering when plant and method are set (if not done at the tender stage) and then using 'production engineering' analytical and human methods to refine things - often with significant results! Dick Batt MICE

Posted date

28 August, 2015

Posted time

8:58 pm