Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookies Policy

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

MPs demand Hinkley answers

Comment

Its still a disgusting figure - 18bn for 3GW. Its uninsured. The waste issue is immoral and its the wrong solution. It offers no local engineering job as a substantial percentage of the total workforce. All components come from overseas. Nothing there to hang our hat on and be proud of. I hope the project gets cancelled. A barrage solution in the estuary and elsewhere on the west coast is much more valuable and provides protection against coastal flooding. They would also last longer; they would involve Brits and British labour. All good for the British economy.

Posted date

31 March, 2016

Posted time

0:24 am

required
required
required
required