Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report slates 'unrealistic' Thameslink plans

News

RAILTRACK'S PLANS to upgrade the overcrowded Thameslink service through London are unrealistic and take no account of the long term strategic needs of the route.

These are the conclusions of a report by consultant Town & Country Strategies submitted to the Department of Environment Transport and the Regions as part of the ongoing public consultation on the project.

Railtrack's £800M Thameslink 2000 project to upgrade the busy north- south commuter route through London includes plans to remodel six stations in London and upgrade signalling, track and platforms outside the capital.

The company will retain the existing two-track section of line through central London from Kings Cross to London Bridge but hopes that improved signalling will allow it to increase the flow of trains.

But the Town & Country Strategies report branded this unfeasible. It claimed: 'It will be essential that incoming trains join the central section at precisely timetabled times. This seems very optimistic though, given the considerable distances they will be coming from and the complexity of the network.'

The report also criticised the scheme for not taking into account probable long term increases in traffic on the route. It called for Railtrack to quadruple the central section of track through London.

Transport minister Keith Hill announced in December that a public inquiry would open in early spring after receiving more than 1,000 objections.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.