Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report on Scottish infrastructure shows 'sorry performance'


THE ICE in Scotland has accused the Scottish Executive and the Scottish Parliament of a 'sorry performance' on infrastructure, and warned that they must significantly improve if they are win public confidence.

The accusations are made in the Scottish version of the twiceyearly UK 'State of the Nation' report card jointly published by NCE and the Institution.

The Scottish version, produced annually by the two Scottish Associations, is circulated to 1,000 key Scottish politicians and other opinion formers. It tackles the work of the Scottish Executive and the Edinburgh Parliament in eight vital infrastructure sectors and the results make sorry reading, according to ICE Scottish executive secretary Wylie Cunningham.

'In May 2003, we shall see what sort of Scottish administration will win the second term. It is an inescapable conclusion that both the Executive and Parliament will have to do a great deal better in their final year of this term than they have in the first three if they are to engage the public's interest, let alone win their confidence.'

The Scottish report follows the UK format by asking a panel of experts to scrutinise infrastructure performance across eight core areas, and award grades accordingly (see box).

Overall, the Institution ranked the Scottish performance as D+, or slightly better than poor.

'The Scottish Parliament and Executive can no longer claim to be on a learning curve, yet progress in delivering infrastructure remains woefully slow, ' comments the report.

'Scotland has a capacity to be a model of good practice in the strategic delivery and maintenance of its infrastructure, but this needs effective leadership, bold planning, adequate investment and continuity of policy implementation. At best, the jury is still out on this.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.