Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Renewable energy groups reject built-in NPS targets

Calls for explicit renewable energy targets to be included in National Policy Statements (NPSs) were dealt a blow this week after renewable groups a pro-wind lobby rejected this approach to building new low-carbon infrastructure.

Giving evidence to the Energy and Climate Change Committee of MPs this week renewable energy groups said they favoured a market-based approach without explicit targets in NPSs. The nuclear industry also endorsed this view.

Last week green groups claimed decisions made by the new Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) could be challenged by judicial review as carbon reduction targets were not considered in energy policy statements (News 21 January).

“It is not for the IPC to pick technologies,” said British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) head of offshore renewables Peter Madigan, explaining that prioritising different forms of energy generation should be dealt with by government policies.

But BWEA planning advisor Gemma Grimes said NPSs would see more renewable energy projects progress.
“The market has been successful in putting projects forward, but the planning system has failed to put the projects through,” she said.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I am not sure if my comment is totally relevant to the above article but here goes.

    The government has stated that it is going to build 6000 wind turbines by2020, some of which will be in very difficult locations and require new technology. By my caculation 6000 equates to erecting about 10 per week. Can we resource that number of turbines in the time? By this calculation we should have erected 30 this month.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.