Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Regulator to rule on Network Rail's 'efficiencies' underspend

News

NETWORK RAIL will find out next month if the rail regulator is satisfi ed with its reasons for a £1bn underspend in the last financial year.

The Offi ce of the Rail Regulator (ORR) has been investigating the rail operator to see if this is the result of getting better value for money, cutting out unnecessary work or just putting work off.

The ORR is reviewing the findings of independent regulatory reporters this week, before announcing its conclusions.

'Network Rail's reasons are given as 'efficiency' but we have to examine if 'efficiency' is unit cost efficiency or changing scope, or another word for deferrals, ' said director of regulatory economics John Thomas.

The rail operator has been under pressure since last February when it revealed to NCE that it was heading for an £850M underspend for 2004/5 (NCE 3 February).

It said £350M of the total related to renewals projects that 'have yet to be fully justified'.

The other £500M was 'made up of genuine efficiencies and enhancements that are not yet ready to move forward'.

Network Rail will be allowed to keep money from genuine effi ciency savings - for the duration of the period 2005-2008.

But it will not be allowed to benefi from underspending resulting from missed targets or scope reductions affecting the long term sustainability of the network.

The ORR can squeeze Network Rail budgets in its next review of track access charges, if it is unsatisfi ed with its performance.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.