Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more



Your leader Transport: good for London is good for us all (NCE 3 June) raises some interesting points and comes close to identifying the crux of the problem.

Radical ideas and radical solutions are indeed necessary if we are to improve public transport in London. As you acknowledge, introducing congestion charging in central London has been an unprecedented success.

Increasing the number of buses, coupled with congestion charging, was the most costeffective option for a short to medium term improvement.

Few will deny that buses have improved dramatically in the past four years.

However, radical long-term solutions depend on sufficient funding, without which few plans can be implemented.

Building new rail and underground links takes a long time, whereas improvements in buses can be easily gained through increased capacity and improved reliability. It is only fair that Londoners see an improvement in public transport provision. Until funding is available for largescale projects, improving the bus service is the best and only realistic option.

I whole-heartedly agree with your assertion that 'Transport:

good for London is good for us all', and support your call for all civil engineers 'to fight for transport schemes'. Hopefully the Treasury will share our views ahead of the imminent spending review.

Peter Hendy, managing director, Surface Transport, Transport for London, Windsor House, 42-50 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0TL

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.