Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Quick question

The Driver's Alliance is a lobby group wanting 'Freedom of the Roads' (Letters last week).

While I am sure that some of their aims such as more spending of motorist's taxes on the roads are laudable, Peter Robert's comments on speed cameras are not the full story.

In my day job with a London borough, I work with the local safety camera partnership on new camera sites on our borough roads and in London at least, new cameras are a very rare thing.

They are very much a last resort and only deployed at the very worst collision locations. Recent research has confirmed that this approach does work and keeps these areas safer for all road users.

If you are caught speeding or jumping a red light, I really fail to see where there is a defence. I do agree that more traffic police are needed to deal with poor and dangerous driving, but if some of the fines from cameras were to be channelled directly into traffic policing, I cannot see that anyone would be in a position to argue. If you drive within the law, you will not be caught by a camera!


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.