Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Quake expectations

Letters

I agree with the 7% of engineers who believe that, in light of the recent Birmingham earthquake, the UK should adopt Eurocode 8 (NCE 26 September).

According to the article the earthquake was the largest felt in this country for decades and measured 4.8 on the Richter Scale. We all know the meaning of the logarithmic scale on which the above units are based and know that structural damage was restricted to a minimum.

However, if safety is the essence of structural design, I cannot ignore the possibility, even if this is a serviceability matter.

The vast majority of medium and medium-to-high rise buildings are designed to resist horizontal forces such as wind.

Few designs consider earth movements.

As Booth says in the article, a simplified, quasi-static approach, probably using computational techniques, should be sufficient and as far as detailing is concerned, the wisdom and experiences of other countries would help, where needed.

Eurocode 8 can add in producing an integrated design approach for buildings and structures in the UK.

John N Karadelis, lecturer in engineering mechanics, Coventry University, j. karadelis@coventry. ac. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.