Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Putting Tube subsidies in context

LETTERS

Neil Morton states that there are 434M passenger journeys each year on the Tube (NCE 7 February). Like much of his argument this is wrong.

In 2000/01 there were 970M passenger journeys on the London Underground - 33M more than on the national railways, according to the Bulletin of Public Transport Statistics Great Britain: 2001.

Improving the Tube will assist the development of London's economy, help contain road congestion, provide mobility for people without cars, and improve conditions for passengers.

These 'external' benefits are estimated by the London Transport annual report 1999/2000 to be worth in excess of £4bn a year.

The Underground's income in 2000/01 was £1,229M and its costs (including depreciation) were £1,497M giving a subsidy of 28p per journey or 5.8p per passenger mile. Subsidy rates for national rail franchises were 5.3p per passenger mile.

However these rates vary widely being generally below average in London and the South (about 2.4p) and much higher on cross country and provincial services. North Western Trains for example had a subsidy of over 20p per passenger mile.

If full costs to passengers is to be the sauce for the capital's goose then why not for the province's gander - at 20p extra per passenger mile it would only add up to £1,000 or so for the average commuter?

David Bayliss (F), david. bayliss@btinternet. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.