Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Put an end to the Eurocode fiasco


It can be no surprise that 'switching to structural Eurocodes will cost design consultancies millions. . .'

(NCE 22 July). What is surprising is that engineers expect the public to pay '. . . the government must invest at least £10M. . .' (NCE 29 July).

BS 449 was introduced in 1932 and CP114 (under another name) in 1934. Over the next 60 years or so, hundreds of thousands of adequate structures, based on these codes, were built not only in the UK but throughout the British influenced world.

In 1972 CP110 was introduced. The man from the Cement & Concrete Association explained that the new code would produce the same design as if CP114 had been used, more or less.

So what's the point? some wag asked. He was quickly put in his place - it's a whole new philosophy - the limit state philosophy.

In 1987 members of the Institution of Structural Engineers were asked 'Should permissible stress codes such as CP114 and BS449 be updated and made available for design purposes. . .'? Of those who replied, 78% said yes - the wrong answer apparently.

As the present government can axe all tram schemes at the stroke of a pen, perhaps it can also end the Eurocode fiasco in a similarly dramatic manner.

Malcolm Millais (M), malcolm. millais@clix. pt

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.