Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Pressure point


As a normally placid retired civil engineer, my blood pressure immediately rose on reading Institution of Structural Engineers' president Bob McKittrick's claims that civil engineers were not qualified to carry out major structural engineering work (NCE 3 October).

I was trained by and have trained many engineers to ICE IStructE standard or both, and have never made or heard this assertion in over 40 years in the industry. I have found that many IStructE engineers are only so because they could not meet the requirements of the ICE.

Many engineers firstly qualified with ICE and are satisfied to rest on their laurels.

Others have the urge to top up their qualifications and add IStructE. Be that as it may, they are all, generally, good engineers in their own fields.

There are specialists in roads, earthworks, bridges, dams, piling, sewerage and geotechnics. Is it suggested that IStructE's should not dabble in these areas? I sincerely hope that all engineers are trained to know what they can do themselves and when they need to call in the experience of others.

Colin Sanderson (M).

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.