Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Pressure on as water prices set to rise

Plans for a tougher water abstraction regime as outlined in the government’s water White Paper could lead to a huge strain on water-intensive businesses through increased water prices, engineers this week told NCE.

Sustainable future for UK water usage

The white paper aims to ensure that future water use is sustainable and sees the limiting of abstraction from rivers as a central plank to future strategy.

Without such an approach, Britain faces a future of water shortages, and lasting environmental damage, with some rivers running dry, environment secretary Caroline Spelman cautioned.

Atkins managing director of environmental and water management Mike Woolgar told NCE that this was a huge change and the report was unclear how the plan would be implemented.

The white paper commits the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to start consultation on a new regime in early 2012. But details were limited. Woolgar also warned that any change would put pressure on businesses that need large volumes of water and could force them to move.

“It’s not going to be easy to implement this in a situation where rivers are already over-abstracted,” he said.

“Currently we enjoy clean water at the turn of a tap, and watch it drain away without a thought. But parts of England actually have less rainfall per person than many Mediterranean countries”

Environment secretary Caroline Spelman

“It will change costs for people. [Defra] is looking at volume price and pricing in relation to scarcity. This might even incentivise people to move their businesses from a high scarcity area to a low scarcity area. It’s social engineering and it’s very political.”

Woolgar admitted that changes were necessary. The white paper says the current system, set up in the 1960s, was not “originally designed to protect the environment or manage competing demands for water”.

The system currently allows water companies to extract fixed volumes of water from rivers regardless of river levels.

“Currently we enjoy clean water at the turn of a tap, and watch it drain away without a thought. But parts of England actually have less rainfall per person than many Mediterranean countries,” Spelman said.

“Making sure we’ve got enough water for everyone is going to be one of the major challenges this country will have to deal with in the years ahead. We can already see the type of problems we may face, with parts of Britain still in drought even though we’re in December.

“With water expected to be less predictable as time goes on we all have to play our part in ensuring our water supply remains secure.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • Barry Walton

    It is a great pity that we still have politicians and engineers blithering on about how some bits of England have less rainfall than Med rim countries or other selected areas of the planet. It matters not. We have a drought situation in East Anglia because it has not been engineered out. That matters and we need to change direction from chasing relatively short term 'efficiency' and relacing it with robustness. What we are fairly certain of is that a lot more rain lands and will continue to land on the islands than we use for potable water, irrigation, industrial and commercial use, recreation and sustaining the environment. What is required is a long term plan of action to capture sufficient of that rain, store it and deliver it to where it is needed coupled with tuning use levels and place of use. None of this is beyond the industry to deliver.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Once, 20 plus years ago, in the Civil's basement I came across a 19th century report proposing a north south feeder main to solve the problem. I suggest Spelman et al read it. The water is there, the technology is there . Stop talking

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Water is free! What you pay for is the collection, treatment and distribution.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.