I read your 'Nuclear' comment and almost despaired. There is a choice to be made between an ever increasing dependency on gas from various unstable and undemocratic states to the East and creating a core generating capacity in this country that is completely under UK control.
To me there can be no doubt of the sensible option. It would include locally sourced gas for as long as possible, probably coal because we have it and the 'clean technology' is available, and a very considerable proportion of nuclear because there are no other reliable alternatives, except possibly tidal and biomass in the medium to long term.
Energy saving is also essential, but very difficult and expensive in any property more than 50 or 60 years old - and I speak from experience.
The choice is, therefore, pretty stark. Risk the consequences of possible political upheaval in the East of Europe compared to new nuclear technology at home.
SF Smith (M), birgitsmith @whsmithnet. co. uk