Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Povl Ahm

Povl Ahm, former chairman of Ove Arup & Partners, believes it would be 'silly' not to use a confidential reporting scheme if one is available. 'I have no doubt that information of great value to the profession isn't being passed on,' he says.

'If there is an issue of risk to the public an engineer's responsibility is quite clear - he should disclose what he knows.'

Ahm is particularly concerned about the knowledge that might be accumulated by those employed to carry out independent design checks on major structures. 'I remember an occasion when we were carrying out such a check and we discovered that in one element the actual factor of safety was little more than 1.0.

'It turned out that the designer involved had been used to elastic theory and had misunderstood the new ultimate state code - which I am sure many other designers had problems with. If a CROSS scheme had existed then, I would have been able to disclose the information for the benefit of the profession.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs