Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Positive image

Letters to the Editor

I first came across the Tredgold definition of civil engineering while I was at university. Even then it struck me as old-fashioned, and I found it hard to equate with what I was studying or wanted to do. I like the new definition. It fits both what I do and my aspirations. It presents a positive image of what I am. I like to be perceived as a custodian of the world, rather than as its dominator and exploiter. So congratulations to the Future Framework implementation team!

Yet, I have a slight niggle of doubt about why we are changing the definition. Is it to reflect better the engineer's changing role? Or are we fudging the definition to open the Institution to all-comers, simply to wield the power and influence of a large organisation and fill our coffers?

Simon Bisset (G),

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.