Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Politicking off

Letters

The excellent contributions to Debate by Jim Wheeler and Andrew McNaughton widened the discussion way beyond its narrow origins (NCE last week). McNaughton's approach was both predictable and wholly justifiable, coming as it did from a necessarily defensive viewpoint, whereas Mr Wheeler's arguments could encompass both the engineering and philosophical parameters, particularly 'Have we yet heard the full story?'

The Thatcher driven ideological switch from integrated public service to a separated and profit led business ethos has, as Mr Wheeler suggests, produced a rag-tag of conflicting objectives, to the financial and safety detriment of the traveller. It took an appalling series of disasters to bring some sanity to the situation.

In my view, Railtrack had no option but to act as it did, if only to offer some degree of comfort to its customers. The real culprits, as ever, are the politicians whose incompetence and mendacity seem to know no bounds and who could find no response to Railtrack's actions, other than to insist that the work be completed before the election.

JD Mortimer(M) 21 Green Drive, Clitheroe, BB7 2BB

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.