Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Police and Highways Agency in hard shoulder safety row

The Highways Agency is set to defy Police concerns about road safety and switch to permanent hard shoulder use in its next tranche of managed motorways projects, NCE has learnt.


Hard shoulder running: Poised to become permanent on new schemes

Work on a raft of managed motorway projects designed to use the hard shoulder permanently is about to start on site despite serious concerns expressed by some Police forces.

The Agency has decided that all managed motorway projects starting in 2013 will be designed to its new standard for all-lane running.

This is defined in interim advice note 161/12 published last year. The note also permits cutting the number of overhead sign gantries used - requiring them at motorway entry points only. It also allows the spacing between vehicle refuges to be increased from 500m to a maximum of 2.5km.

Schemes designed to the new standard include the section of the M1 between junctions 32 and 35a in South Yorkshire.

Head of roads policing for South Yorkshire, chief inspector Stuart Walne, told NCE he had “fundamental concerns” about the strategy.

“While we recognise that in the current financial climate the Highways Agency is trying to find the best overall system of safety in a number of areas, we are concerned that the scheme as designed for the M1 does not give us sufficient options to operate flexibly,” he said.

It is understood that other forces have expressed similar concerns, including Greater Manchester Police. It polices the M60, which is also scheduled to be converted to a managed motorway between junctions 8 and 12 next year.

The Agency has been consulting on the M1 managed motorways project publicly and with interested parties via the South Yorkshire Safer Roads Partnership which includes South Yorkshire Police. It said it was confident that its new standard was safe.

“The new managed motorway standard has evolved from our experience of existing hard shoulder running schemes on the M42 and M6. Our studies have shown that we can convert the hard shoulder to a permanent running lane with fewer gantries and refuge areas without compromising safety. With the spacing of refuges increased we expect to reduce their illegal or improper use and we will no longer need to activate processes of turning hard shoulder running on and off again,” said an Agency spokesman.

The Agency also claims that police concerns relate to one specific type of incident - that of vehicles stopping in a live lane at off-peak times.

However, Walne disputed this. “With all-lane running there is no natural safety break for traffic incidents.

“Emergency refuges do not provide this,” he said. “If things go wrong we have to be able to secure access to deal with traffic safety incidents, police roads and manage criminality that we know will happen.

“We have to be able to safely stop a vehicle and there is far less risk doing this on a hard shoulder than in a live lane.

“We have ongoing fundamental concerns with the Agency’s plans, but we are working to a collapsing time frame. The project is expected to start in April and at present we are not confident of having reached a solution that satisfies all parties.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • Philip Alexander

    I am delighted that the police have at last questioned the Highways Agency's obsession with motorway hard shoulder running, certainly on a permanent basis. They should have been more vocal in opposition to this crackpot idea when the managed motorways concept was first raised as a cost saving measure a few years ago. Isn't it amazing how they come up with these euphemistic descriptions (Managed Motorways) to obscure the basic purpose of the idea which is to save money. It's nothing to do with safety and everything about cost.
    I realize the Agency is merely doing the politicians' bidding in the interests of penny-pinching but do we have to wait for the inevitable fatal accidents to de-bunk the assertion that this is a safe thing to do? Of course it's not safe and then to continue the lie that motorways can continue to be called 'motorways' even when they have no continuous hard shoulder (will the Highway Code have to be changed?) is compounding the insult to the intelligence of highways planners and engineers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.