Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Pole position

Letters

I have found Martin Barnard's recent articles on the designer's role in safety very interesting.

Integrating the supply team is a great idea but do clients and contractors want more input from designers? The HSE will not be able to insist on this team structure.

Building sites are dangerous places, regardless of design.

Design per se is rarely dangerous. It is the method of construction/maintenance that creates dangers and we need to question who specifies the 'doing' and with what incentive.

The modern way of thinking is to allow the contractor/site manager to utilise their expertise when it comes to how to construct, rather than designers to issue old fashioned prescriptive designs with method statements that are seen to restrict programmes, methods, innovation etc.

These factors mean that clients and particularly contractors are rather on their own (by choice) when it comes to deciding how to work on site.

Simon Pole, consulting structural engineer, Pole Associates and Click Property.co.uk, Admel House, 24 High Street, Wimbledon, London SW19

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.