Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Points to consider

Letters to the editor

The thinking behind nuclear safety cases is strange. First, we have low probabilities of occurrence being multiplied by high consequence figures. The tolerances on the combined figures necessarily run into orders of magnitude and so lack credibility.

Second, we design facilities and procedures for '1 in 10,000 year' natural disasters. These include earthquakes, floods and other events, although the most frequent and dangerous events over the last few thousand years have been wars. Modern armies or well funded terrorists, with their aircraft and missiles, could spread nuclear fission products over vast areas.

SONE also appears to neglect proven approaches such as energy efficiency (eg pumped storage, better building design, integrated transport/town planning), biomass (maize or cane waste conversion to alcohol, willow coppicing etc) and urban waste incineration.

And what about the greenhouse gases generated in producing steel and concrete shielding, digging deep waste repositories, and dismantling giant reactor buildings?

The ICE secretarial facilities are of course open to lobbyists of all persuasions. However, I worry about the public relations effect on our profession of a long-term association with any controversial single interest group. I would like One Great George Street to be seen as a respected independent think tank, not as a propaganda pool.

Simon Reynolds

simonjreynolds@csi.com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.