Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Plenty of data on Council candidates


Alan Balfour's letter regarding Council elections is both saddening and misleading (NCE last week). The voting papers are accompanied by a brief biography of each candidate, together with an indication of their professional interests.

Subsequently, each candidate's photograph and election statement are published in NCE.

There is, therefore, a host of ways to determine your vote.

You may have particular concerns about the Council's age profile, or you might strongly believe that there ought to be more women on Council. You may consider the balance of consultants, contractors and academics or assess the value of a candidate's professional experience.

More simply, votes may be given to the candidates whose aspirations most closely match your own. Not knowing the candidates need have no bearing. On the contrary, we should hardly wish to have a Council consisting purely of those with the most friends in the Institution's membership.

Simon Stocks (M)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.