Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Percentage point


I find it difficult to accept that 74% of the N C E 5 0 0 support the Health & Safety Executive's attempts to put greater liabilities on designers .

It is hard to believe that since the CDM regulations came into effect some six years ago there has been no published analysis of the causes of site accidents attributable to design, and what particular design features require modification.

Designers need prescriptive rules on what to do and what not to do to stay within the law. The airyfairy wording of the legislation is not good enough. One can only hope that the new ACOP gives detailed requirements based on a rigorous analysis of the causes of past site accidents.

GM Pinfold, NCL Stewart Scott, 112 Regency Street, London, SW1P 4AX

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.