Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Overseas engineer denied ICE corporate membership


ICE'S PROFESSIONAL development committee is to deny an overseas engineer corporate membership even though his membership of a recognised overseas professional institution entitles him to an MICE qualification.

The Hong Kong based engineer's application for corporate membership is expected to be rejected on the grounds that he is professionally incompetent.

The engineer failed ICE's corporate professional review two weeks before he was accepted by the overseas body, ICE's professional development committee heard last week.

The engineer, who had no connection with the country which accepted his application, was suspected of deliberately applying for membership of its professional body as a back door entry to ICE membership.

No formal procedure was in place to ensure the ICE's own qualification took precedence over the mutual exemption agreement but acceptance of the application would not stand up in a court of law, the committee heard.

ICE training manager Gareth Jones told the committee: 'This guy didn't just fail the professional review, he failed it dismally. How will we look in a court of law if he makes a mess of something and has got MICE after his name.'

The engineer was found to lack technical and safety knowledge and had poorly analysed engineering problems at his interview. He also failed both professional review essays.

The ICE's legal advisers agreed that the Institution was right to deny membership, but warned that there was nothing to stop the candidate reapplying unless the rules were changed.

Committee member David Rogers urged the ICE to re-examine all its mutual exemption agreements with a view to closing other loopholes which might exist.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.