Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Osborne: No more infrastructure spending cuts this year

Chancellor George Osborne this week said there would be no more capital spending reductions in the current financial year, saving major infrastructure projects from the public spending axe.

But he warned that the cuts in the autumn comprehensive spending review would be deeper than originally feared, with most government departments facing a cut of around 25% over four years.

In his emergency Budget on Tuesday, Osborne said no further capital spending cuts will be announced until the comprehensive spending review on 20 October.

This will set out spending plans for the years 2011/12 to 2014/15. “Well-judged capital spending by government can help provide the new infrastructure our economy needs to compete in the modern world,” said Osborne.

“I think an error was made in the early 1990s when the then [Tory] government cut capital spending too much - perhaps because it is easier to stop new things being built than to cut the budgets of existing programmes.

“We have faced many tough choices about the areas in which we should make additional savings, but I have decided that capital spending should not be one of them.”

However Osborne said that only projects that can demonstrate “a significant economic return to the country” would be funded.

Assessing what those projects are will be an important part of the spending review, he said. Osborne added that regional infrastructure schemes would be supported in areas where cuts will be felt the most.

He pledged to continue with the upgrade of the Tyne & Wear Metro, the extension of the Manchester Metrolink, the Birmingham New Street station redevelopment and improvements to the rail lines to Sheffield and between Liverpool and Leeds.

He said that a regional growth fund would be set up to provide finance for other regional capital projects over the next two years.

Osborne also said that new businesses set up outside London, the South East and the Eastern regions would be exempt from up to £5,000 of employer national insurance payments for each of the first 10 employees they hire.

Brian Fitzpatrick, transport partner at cost consultant EC Harris predicted a revolution in road maintenance procurement to promote cost efficiency as a result of the 25% cuts in departmental spending.

“The Highways Agency is probably going to have to look at shared procurement with local authorities,” he said.”And neighbouring local councils will need to look at rationalising their procurement and delivering joint asset arrangements.

Collaboration will be the theme in projects as in politics.”The budget was tough on local authorities, imposing a two year pay freeze for public sector workers from next year.

An independent commission chaired by former work and pensions secretary John Hutton will carry out a review of public service pensions and consider the case for short-term savings in the autumn spending review.

Osborne said the rate of VAT would rise to 20% from January next year. He confirmed that other taxes affecting the construction industry would also rise as planned.

The standard rate of landfill tax will increase by £8 per tonne each year from April 2011 until at least 2014. The aggregates levy rate will also increase from £2.00 per tonne to £2.10 per tonne.

The ICE welcomed Osborne’s decision to protect some infrastructure spending. “We are pleased the new government has taken heed of past mistakes recognising the consequences of slashing infrastructure spending,”
said ICE president professor Paul Jowitt.

Osborne: No more infrastructure spending cuts this year

Readers' comments (3)

  • CHARLES ROBERTS

    I am glad to see that our President is now speaking on behalf of the Institution rather than Tom Foulkes who has continually sought publicity for positions which do not represent the members views.

    Let there be an end to Foulkes representing us in the media with such statements as "Engineers supporting Labour" and " infrastructure projects cannot be built without continuing non EEC labour immigation. Even when Antony Oliver, NCE Editor, in his latest editorial advises members to go and work in the Middle East because there are not enough jobs for them in this country!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Foulkes, should not be empowered to speak on behalf of the Institution. He is there to represent OUR views not his own!.

    The pronouncements of the Institution seem to have a distinct left wing bias that is not evident from the general tone of letters in the NCE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bill Thicknes

    It is vital that the leading figures in our representative bodies and press have a voice on the political stage. We need to speak out on behalf of engineers, the engineering profession and the importance of a viable national infrastructure. This needs to be coordinated but we shouldn't let internal issues prevent the messages from getting across.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.