Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Opposer: Carle

This debate reminds me of a letter I received when France was about to build its first nuclear plant.

'Please don't worry us with nuclear. We already have electricity'.

Of course, it is not that simple. Power has to be generated. And there is always a cost.

CO 2is not a risk - it is a fact.

Coal is a heavy polluter. Gas may be twice as efficient, but then you have put all your eggs in one basket.

Yes, we have to make energy conservation efforts. But the only practical way of achieving this is tax - and what government is going to want to do that after recent events in France and the UK?

Chernobyl was bad. But do you ban all cars because of one careless driver? Since then, bodies like WANO have worked throughout Europe, providing safety advice and recommending improvements.

In France, renewable energy already supplies 15%. We have experimented a lot, and know that it is limited in terms of large scale generation.

We must not judge by emotion, but by consequence. If Europe could abandon nuclear, then fine. But when nuclear runs out we will realise the limits of renewables and continue to burn fossil fuels.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.