Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Opponents of Garden Bridge win right to further legal challenge

The legal battle over the proposed Garden Bridge across the Thames in London is to go to judicial review in June.

Lambeth and Westminster Councils have backed plans for the £175M bridge, but this week a judge said that opponents’ claims that the structure will obstruct views to the north of the river, and that there is inadequate provision for on-going maintenance costs must be heard in court.

It means that Lambeth Council’s decision to approve Thomas Heatherwick’s Garden Bridge will be debated in court. The challenge has been spearheaded by the Waterloo Community Development Group leader Michael Ball.

Garden Bridge

The legal battle over the proposed Garden Bridge continues

A statement from The Garden Bridge Trust, the charity which is promoting the bridge, said it is working closely with the London Borough of Lambeth to discuss the next steps. It claimed 240t copper-nickel alloy skin will protect the Bridge, making it maintenance free for 120 years. It added there was a clear business plan to cover the estimated £3.5M per annum needed for on-going maintenance and operations.

A Lambeth Council spokesperson said it was carefully considering the decision to allow a judicial review.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.