Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

One off £30M charge dents Keller's rise in profits

Keller’s half-year results have been overshadowed by a £30M exceptional charge for a disputed contract. The firm posted a £32.5M pre-tax profit for the first six months of 2014, a 21% increase on the same period last year - but this will be almost wiped out by the charge, which centres on a project that Keller’s UK business completed in 2008.

A statement from the group said: “The dispute relates to purported defects in a floor slab at a warehouse for which Keller Limited [the UK Keller business] undertook the design and construction of the piling. These purported defects are alleged by other parties to be due, in part at least, to deficiencies in the provision of Keller’s services.

“The claims intimated against Keller Limited, which are currently the subject of litigation, are denied and being vigorously defended. However, the board has determined that, given the uncertainties inherent in any litigation, it would be appropriate to record an exceptional charge of £30M in the group’s 2014 half year results.

“The amount is stated before taking account of recoveries under applicable insurances which are yet to be agreed, as these cannot be recognised under IFRS [International Financial Reporting Standards].”

Keller’s interim results were otherwise positive, with revenue up 22% to £788.2M (2013: £644.6M).

Keller chief executive Justin Atkinson said: “We expect the group’s results for the full year to be in line with current market expectations and, looking further ahead, we remain optimistic about our long-term prospects. Keller continues to make positive progress against its strategy and is well positioned to take full advantage of future opportunities.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.