Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

On the RAC

LETTERS

I read Clive Kennedy's reply to Brian Hanson's view that the RAC should concentrate on rescuing stranded motorists (NCE 28 June).

I am sure Hanson can show that traffic calming reduces accidents, but can Kennedy prove his assertion that the problems move elsewhere?

Professionals in the field refer to factors, not causes.

Accidents are, by nature, random chance events and result from the coming together of a number of factors. To isolate any one factor as a cause does not help prevent future accidents - the idea is to find common factors and to break the chain.

Factors which could influence the outcome include the road being wet, the driver's age, the condition of the car's tyres and whether the car had ABS. Speed, although important, is not the only factor in the real world.

To state that the only way to reduce road accidents is by education is to ignore the work of police in enforcement and that of engineers in changing the environment. The job of preventing accidents, road or otherwise, is for all of us and to concentrate on only one aspect - be it speed or education - is counter productive.

Richard Todd, (M) richtea@unisonfree. net

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.