Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Olympic legacy plan attacked by London Assembly committee

Decisions about the legacy of the London Olympic Park are flawed and have hampered efforts to secure investment, London politicians claimed this week.

Plans for the Olympic Stadium and media centre bore the brunt of criticisms from the London Assembly’s Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee.

It said plans made in 2007 to reduce the 80,000 capacity stadium to a 25,000 seat venue suitable for athletics were “flawed” and have hampered efforts to secure a long-term use for the arena.

It concluded that a major football or rugby club would have to move in if it were to generate significant local employment. Such a tenant could also attract big enough crowds to produce the revenue streams which would let the stadium pay for itself.

“An athletics stadium was never going to be in the interests of the East End”

Len Duvall

“An elite 25,000 seat athletics stadium is not, and was never going to be, in the long term interests of the East End or of the taxpayer,” said committee chairman Len Duvall.

The decision to abandon talks with major football clubs West Ham and Tottenham Hotspur in 2007 – only to reopen them in 2010 – was considered likely to add to stadium conversion costs. Retaining a permanent athletics track in the stadium is thought to concern potential tenants.

The reduction in scope of the media centre was also criticised as making it less attractive to potential legacy tenants.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.