Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Oklahoma bridge bash triggers pier protection study


ENGINEERS IN Oklahoma last week confirmed that they had launched a full appraisal of bridge pier protection following last month's fatal bridge bash (NCE 30 May).

A section of the bridge carrying the Interstate 40 motorway collapsed after a barge travelling upstream struck unprotected piers outside the main shipping lane. The bridge's only protection against barge impact was on the upstream side of the piers immediately next to the shipping lane.

Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODT) bridge manager Tim West said: 'A full report is being undertaken to evaluate the risk from errant barges following the barge impact that caused last month's disaster.'

US contractor Gilbert Central Corporation won the 120 day, £7.5M repair contract after an emergency Oklahoma Transport Commission meeting last week.

The contractor has 57 days to get traffic moving again across the Arkansas river. Barges holding up the section of highway hanging from the bridge deck after it fell onto them were removed last week and the replacement of the missing 35m section of deck is set to start.

Replacement piled foundations will have to be driven outside the remains of the existing structure. These new piers will again be twin columns rather than the full width piers supporting the rest of the structure. No extra protection against barge collision will be added.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.