Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ofwat defends water model

News

WATER REGULATOR Ofwat this week hit back at water company claims that its cost evaluation model for capital projects is flawed.

'We disagree that the model is flawed; it has stood the test of time, ' Ofwat director of costs and performance and chief engineer Bill Emery told NCE.

He said that the Monopolies & Mergers Commission and the Competition Commission had both found the model to be a sound way of assessing the cost of capital schemes.

Last week water companies criticised the model for being unreliable. They claimed that it was jeopardising hundreds of millions of pounds worth of planned projects (News last week).

Every five years, Ofwat asks water companies to price 100 standardised capital projects to help it determine water company prices for the following five years. These estimates are used to value future projects proposed by companies.

From this the most efficient companies are identified and their costs used as benchmarks for the other water companies.

Emery rubbished claims that this model favoured companies that build low capital expenditure projects which cost more to operate.

Operating costs are not taken into account in the Ofwat model, he said, but are during the price review process.

Emery also maintained that there was still scope for companies to carry out their capital projects more efficiently. 'Even the best companies can make some improvements. Every year they get a little bit more efficient, ' he said.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.