Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Off key

Letters

Foresight (NCE 22 January) is right to recommend Peter Murray's book about the Sydney Opera House. However the description that is was a 'successful building project' seems to be stretching a point.

This centre for performing arts took 16 years to design and build and cost something like 10 times the initial budget. The client required that the main hall should be able to stage both grand opera and symphony concerts, uses that are diametrically opposed in terms of seating, backstage planning and acoustics. This was 'well known' at the time, as was the downfall of the original architect J rn Utzon who never was able to show he had squared this circle.

The roof that finally got architectural approval was also so heavy that the sub-structures which had already been built had to be strengthened. Then every bolt holding the doublycurved concrete tiles in place had to be surveyed in three dimensions and the joints between the units sealed with mastic which had to be replaced less than 20 years later. And so on.

If Foresight considers this to be a successful building project it would be interesting to know what an unsuccessful one is!

Malcolm Millais, malcolm. millais@clix. pt

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.