Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Obama's National Infrastructure Bank plan slammed

US congressman and transport officials and experts have slammed Obama’s plan for a National Infrastructure Bank, claiming it would add to the amount of red tape and federal bureaucracy that already slows down and diverts funding away from transport and infrastructure projects.

Members of the Congress Transportation Committee - and witnesses speaking to a committee hearing - highlighted existing federal programmes and authorities that could be strengthened to finance infrastructure projects more effectively than simply increasing the size of the government.

Thirty-three state infrastructure banks already exist.

“We must use every responsible mechanism possible to move projects and expand our capacity to finance infrastructure maintenance and improvements, but a National Infrastructure Bank is dead on arrival in Congress,” said Republican committee chairman John Mica. “Thirty-three state infrastructure banks already exist and we can ensure financing and build upon this foundation without creating a new level of federal bureaucracy.

“We do not need to create more federal bureaucracy. In fact, with over 100 separate federal surface transportation programmes, we need less bureaucracy,” he said, “The federal government also has existing financing programs that serve the same purpose as a National Infrastructure Bank, such as TIFIA, RRIF and others, that we can improve and strengthen.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • Tim Swift

    In which case I should hope such claims will be reinforced with some actual proposals...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.