Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nuclear power wins heated energy debate


NUCLEAR POWER won an overwhelming thumbs up from engineers and the public in Plymouth this week following a debate organised by the ICE's South West region.

The motion This house believes that nuclear power should be a significant contributor to the UK's future energy supply was carried by 54 votes to 24, with only four abstentions, after a passionate debate on each side of the motion.

Speaking for the motion were British Nuclear Fuels head of energy Richard Mason, and Jacobs Babtie technical director, nuclear division, Justin Goldberg.

They argued that nuclear power was a vital and safe part of the UK's energy mix. They said that unless a new generation of power stations came on line the nation would struggle to meet its growing energy demand and fail to meet its carbon reduction targets.

Speaking against the motion were Friends of the Earth campaign co-ordinator Mike Burkin and NCE editor Antony Oliver.

They argued that nuclear technology had served the nation well for 50 years, but that it was time to focus effort and investment on finding the next generation of clean power generation. They said nuclear fission power stations were flawed and dangerous.

The lively debate was chaired by former ICE energy board chairman Robert Freer.

A mixture of engineers and members of the public attended the debate at Plymouth University.

INFOPLUS Visit www. nceplus. co. uk to take part in NCE's online questionnaire on the future of energy supply in the UK.

Results and comments will be published in the new year.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.