Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nuclear: have things moved on since Chernobyl disaster?

The potential consequences of a disaster at a nuclear power station are so huge that no level of risk could ever be acceptable.
We engineers realise that, as with bridges and dams or any complex system, the risk of catastrophic failure can be minimised but can never be totally eliminated.

This being so, it is dishonest of us to give unqualified support to the notion that nuclear power is safe – it is only safe until it fails.

Aircraft manufacturers will tell you that their products are safe and indeed they are – right up to the point where one falls out of the sky.

Bearing in mind that the death toll in the aftermath of a nuclear disaster may be measured in millions or even billions this is not a risk we can justify.

ROGER EVANS (F), evans.roger@virgin.net

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.