Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nuclear debate welcomed

Letters

Regarding the letter from Gerry Beers headed 'Going critical' (NCE letters last week) Antony Oliver should make no apology regarding his comments on the latest push for nuclear power.

They are not only refreshing but also pertinent and sensible.

For decades we have been subjected to the nuclear industry's lobbying and complacency about safety, reinforced by overwhelmingly pro-nuclear views from NCE.

For example, Lord Howie in his regular old articles was incessant in bashing the anti-nuclear power lobby, and included such gems as - and I paraphrase his remarks from memory - 'There is more danger to the public from the use of hedge trimmers than from nuclear power'.

I found the recent articles and comment in NCE the first bit of balance in the debate, and to try and stifle that is quite extraordinary.

Richard Currie (M ret), 2 Rosedale, Talycoed, Monmouth, NP25 5HP

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.