Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

No highway robbery

Letters

I would like to correct your reporting of the secretary of state's announcement of the £1.9bn programme of major schemes on strategic roads over the next three years (News 9 December).

This programme is not £400M down in real terms over the previous three years, but £600M or 50% up, as the table below shows.

The figure given by Simon Chatman, the FTA's chief economist, of £2.13bn capital spend on strategic roads between 2002-03 and 2004-05, includes £0.74bn on capital programmes other than major road schemes (for example, small schemes and technology investment).

The article also compares the figure of £1.9bn for major schemes investment with the £3.9bn three-year total promised in the government's original 10 year transport plan.

Again, the 10 year plan figure includes expenditure on other capital programmes, as well as expenditure on major road renewals (ie maintenance), which is now classified as resource expenditure.

In fact, the public capital investment on strategic roads over 2005-06 to 2007-08 is exactly in line with the levels in the 10 year plan.

Keith Miller (F), director of major projects, Highways Agency, Albion House, Lime Street, Bedford MK40 1LD

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.