Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nirex reassures public on nuclear waste sites


AREAS IDENTIFIED as possible locations for a nuclear waste repository in the 1980s are not necessarily in the running for future disposal sites, Nirex said this week.

The nuclear waste consultant moved to dispel fears that 10 sites on a previously secret shortlist published this week would be in pole position when the subject is revisited.

ther communities may want to volunteer to host disposal facilities to capitalise on employment opportunities, said a Nirex spokesman. This had happened previously in Finland.

The Commission on Radioactive Waste Management is due to report to the government next year, with fresh site selection possibly under way in 2007.

The previous study focused on publicly-owned, 400ha sites with the required capacity and accessibility. This eliminated over 500 candidates.

But Nirex said the previous drive to find a deep geological site, which ended with the government refusing to allow construction at Sellafield, may no longer exist.

And the need to dispose of high-level, heat-generating waste was not considered when the original list was drawn up.

Sites on the shortlist were Bradwell and Potton Island in Essex, Dounreay and Altnabreac in Caithness, Fuday and Sandray on the Western Isles, Killingholme in Humberside, Stanford in Norfolk, two sites at Sellafield and two offshore locations.

Essex County Council leader Lord Hanningfield said Thames Gateway regeneration plans now ruled out further consideration of the Essex sites.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.