Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Concerns emerge over High Speed Two start date

Rail experts this week warned that the construction programme for the High Speed Two line is already in jeopardy, even before public consultation has begun.

Steer Davies Gleave managing director Jim Steer said that although the scheme had “pretty good” top down political support he had doubts that the 2015 deadline for start of construction could be met.

Steer was speaking at NCE’s High Speed Rail Summit. He said that the current plan of aiming for Royal Assent for a Hybrid Bill in 2013 is too late, and that the delay is threatening the project’s start date.

“[Meeting the 2015 start date] would be a damn sight more probable if the Hybrid Bill was planned for 2012 and not 2013,” said Steer.

“[It] would be a damn sight more probable if the Hybrid Bill was planned for 2012 and not 2013”

Jim Steer, Steer Davies Gleave

Government company High Speed Two chairman Sir Brian Briscoe agreed that meeting the start date would be a “big challenge”.

The 204km route plan from London to Birmingham revealed by transport secretary Philip Hammond in December will this week go out to public consultation, which is set to last until the end of July.

Two consultations will be carried out concurrently − one on the overall strategy for high speed rail and one on the detailed route between London and Birmingham.

Briscoe said that this was set to be one of the biggest consultations ever undertaken. He added that once complete, an independent review would be carried out to scrutinise all work done so far.

Nichols Group executive director and ICE president Peter Hansford agreed with Steer that the tight programme would be a challenge.

The current plan involves a phased opening from 2026, but some think there has not yet been enough of a firm commitment from government to this date.

“The key thing that has kept the London 2012 programme on track is the fixed and immovable end date,” he said.

“That is key for any project, and it’s not something I’ve yet heard with High Speed Two.”

Arup global rail leader Colin Stewart, also addressing the conference, highlighted that while High Speed Two calls for much more work than High Speed 1, there is no more time in the programme.

Stewart worked on High Speed 1 and is now working on the route consultation for High Speed Two. He said it was possible to deliver to time, but only if the right programme management is brought in at the right time.

“It is possible […] but an experienced delivery agent is going to be needed to make this work,” he said.

“There is a potential shortage of [programme management] skills in the industry and this follows through to clients and governance. Do we have a [client] body that has been there and done it before?

“[Government] must not under-estimate the importance of the delivery mechanism. The timing of bringing in private sector involvement is going to be critical,” he said.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Can anybody tell me the answers to these questions:-

    a) Will the energy expended in construction outweigh any saved over existing transport in the long term?

    b) Is there going to be any significant effect on the global production of greenhouse gases?

    c) Can this country afford it when there are so many other cutbacks in critical budgets, e.g. NHS, Police, Defence, Education

    d) Will it not blight hundreds of miles of countryside and thousands of peoples lives in a country which is too small for an HSR system?

    e) Who will HS2 benefit, apart from the construction industry?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • a) Probably

    b) Doubt it

    c) Yes, emphatically so. Firstly construction doesn't start for (at least) another 4 years. Secondly, we'll be spending about £2bn a year. The idea is that this will replace Crossrail funding which we're already paying out, but either way, 2bn compared to annual NHS budget alone is miniscule.

    d) Some people have decided that this country is too small for HSR. The evidence is that we're still choosing to fly between Manchester and London, and Scotland and London. Why? because the existing train service is too slow.

    e) Well, anyone that lives on the WCML will get an improved stopping service. There'll be less requirement to widen the motorways. Also, the idea is that as the North becomes easier to get to from the economic centre of the UK, then it'll be more attractive to move businesses there to minimize costs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Continue the debate in NCE's forum: http://www.nce.co.uk/high-speed-2-do-we-need-it/11.thread

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs