Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

New beginnings

Letters

The obliteration of New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina is pretty devastating, and horrible for the inhabitants.

Although the first and obvious reaction is to rebuild, as that city is now officially abandoned, is rebuilding it the obvious solution?

As the USA is not as generous to the unemployed as we are in the UK, then long before New Orleans is rebuilt the displaced people are going to have to find accommodation and employment elsewhere in the USA.

This raises the question of why rebuild the city at all?

If it is found that New Orleans is needed, then it could be rebuilt on a new, higher site, either natural or man-made, close by.

It would not be the first urban area to be repositioned because of a natural disaster.

R Ross Cunningham (M), Station View, Holm Street, Portpatrick, Stranraer, Wigtownshire, Scotland DG9 8LD

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.